• Artist / lot n°
  • Text search
  • Technique search
  • Stylistic period search

    • ONLINE ONLY Art of the 19th to 21st Centuries

    Marc Chagall : Nu au visage double, 30621
    Marc Chagall : Nu au visage double, 30621
    Marc Chagall : 1128 Nu au visage double
    Marc Chagall : 1128 Nu au visage double
    Marc Chagall : 1128 Nu au visage double
    Marc Chagall : 1128 Nu au visage double

    Marc Chagall

    Witebsk 1887 - 1985 Saint-Paul-de-Vence

    1128   

    Nu au visage double

    Estimate CHF 4'000 *
    Hammer price CHF 3'000
    Information without guarantee
    10.09.2024
    German version below
    Shipping fees

    30621

    Colour lithograph on wove paper Arches with watermark

    65.5x47.8 cm

    Signed "Marc Chagall" in pencil by the artist lower right, labelled "Epreuve d'artiste" on the left

    Catalogue Raisonné

    Sorlier 1013

    Condition

    In impeccable print quality and condition

    Comments

    Artist's proof outside the edition of 50 copies.


     
     

    Nu au visage double


    November 1983

    Farblithographie auf Velin Arches mit Wasserzeichen

    65,5x47,8 cm

    Unten rechts vom Künstler in Bleistift signiert "Marc Chagall", links bezeichnet "Epreuve d'artiste"

    Werkverzeichnis

    Sorlier 1013

    Zustand

    In tadelloser Druckqualität und Erhaltung

    Erläuterungen

    Künstlerabzug ausserhalb der Auflage von 50 Exemplaren.


     
     
     
    Estimated shipping fees
    Switzerland CHF150
    Europe CHF250
    USA CHF320
    Overseas CHF325
    Marc Chagall : Nu au visage double, 30621
    Marc Chagall : Nu au visage double, 30621


    For lots marked with an asterisk (*), the hammer price is also subject to VAT.

    KORNFELD
    Excellence and Expertise since 1864
    GALERIE KORNFELD AUKTIONEN AG • Laupenstrasse 41, Postfach, 3008 Bern / Switzerland • Tel +41 31 552 55 55 • galerie@kornfeld.ch
    • By continuing your browsing on this site, you agree to the use of cookies to improve your user experience. Read our privacy statement.    Agree